So, valentines day. I think it's safe
that anyone with half a neuron can read the title and realise my line
on this. A day where romantic gestures are taken advantage of by
shops. And where those same romantic gestures become reversed into
meaningless. This is because romance should be special, spontaneous
and if anything on Valentine's day is seen as romantic, then the lack
of romance for the rest of the year really suggests that your
relationship sucks.
I'll spare you all the love
philosophies I hold that most would incorrectly reject, such as
deceptive frame of mind and active seeking causing a 'settle for 40th
best' relationship. No...
...I would, though, like to point all
towards some ridicules things about the entire subject. It is insane.
It'd be my pleasure to suggest that you are your own most important
person from some evidence from love it's self.
My first piece of evidence demonstrates
the blinding to all badness caused by love. The song 'Close to you'
by Carpenters clearly states the question: 'Why do birds suddenly
appear, every time you are near?'
Now... Not only is she not freaking out
because birds are 'suddenly appearing' about of nowhere right in
front of her eyes. She is actually making it sound like a good thing.
Like she wants to be with someone who is permanently surrounded by
birds. What? Is this some sort of crazy fetish? Living your entire
life like a scene from Alfred Hitchcock's horror film 'The Birds'?
![]() |
| Show me on the doll where they touched you... |
What she also fails to specify is what
the species of bird is... What if they were surrounded by vultures?
Or the person you've fallen in love with happens to be 'The Crow'?
That seems a little less romantic, doesn't it? Your eyes drift across
the room and everything goes in slow motion as you stare at this
wonderful person, then through the corner of your rose tinted eyes
swoops and albatross to decapitate you.
Materialising birds is not romantic.
Next, my issue with the notion of
'giving someone your heart'. I bet that's why evolution gave us a rib
cage? To stop us plunging into our own chest in pursuit of giving
another person some blood drenched human offal as your last ever
gesture. Though some Goths would probably see that as romantic
nobody, who isn't so screwed as to believe the only way they can be
liked is by a group of their own sick kind, would find this a
horrifying concept.
I'm veering from the point of
Valentine's day though – the day where shy kids are allowed to
muster up the courage to send a stalky letter to someone they have a
crush on. A day where romanticism attempts societal objectification
(ooo, big words). What I mean here is that everyone is different. Why
has it got to be all the random cheesy crap. 'You are the light in my
sky'...yeah? Well then what do you call night? Technically, through
most of the winter you dislike this crush of yours. Bad times.
I say we could stick to the Greek
Goddess Aphrodite, and have the day also representing free-for-all
sex. Where you can approach people with cards saying: 'Would you like
to see how stretchy my foreskin is?'.
It's a subjective romance! He thinks
that's cool, who's to judge him.. If she rejects, it'd still be a
more honest rejection than: 'I'll eat your chocolates, but we're
still not dating.'
I think honesty cards would be much
more entertaining for almost any holiday. You could have cards such
as: 'As long as the person I really like is taken, I'm happy to be
with you', Or even 'Y'know, you're not that attractive, but I'd
imagine you have a quick refractory period' (correct term for
cool-down time).
I for one would be flattered by such a
card, and while not much match-making would be going on, at least we
could all have a laugh without 50% of the population forcing you to
be either romantic or depressively single.
Anyway, love should be all
encompassing, rather than repeated:
'I really rather love you, and will
decidedly go out of my way to show you the truth of this on occasion.
In future, please assume that this has not changed until further
notice. Thank you for your time.'


No comments:
Post a Comment